Hearsay Rule Solves Every Admissibility Problem
This trap appears as a wrong-answer choice in 1 active question. Spotting how it is built is the repair: read each example's “why it's attractive” before the “why it's wrong.”
Subject distribution
- Evidence1
Example wrong choices
14874_scripture_escape_room_fear · EVIDENCE · Choice AYes, because the testimony recounts a prior consistent statement by Lydia, who is subject to examination about it.
Why it's attractive
This answer answers a prior-statement question, not the expert-opinion bar.
Why it's wrong
This answer answers a prior-statement question, not the expert-opinion bar.
14874_scripture_escape_room_fear · EVIDENCE · Choice CYes, because Dr. Naomi could determine during the hypnotic session that Lydia was telling the truth.
Why it's attractive
The answer overclaims what the expert can certify.
Why it's wrong
The answer overclaims what the expert can certify.
14874_scripture_escape_room_fear · EVIDENCE · Choice DNo, because admitting testimony based on hypnosis would violate the Constitution.
Why it's attractive
The answer reaches "No" but gives a categorical constitutional hypnosis rule.
Why it's wrong
The answer reaches "No" but gives a categorical constitutional hypnosis rule.
Practice the questions that use this trap as a distractor and get full Wrong Answer Forensics on submit.
Practice questions using this trap →