MisconceptionObserved in bank
Hiring Lawyer Triggers 6th Amendment
This trap appears as a wrong-answer choice in 1 active question. Spotting how it is built is the repair: read each example's “why it's attractive” before the “why it's wrong.”
Subject distribution
- CRIMINAL1
Example wrong choices
18132_daniel-ministry · CRIMINAL · Choice ANo, because Daniel validly waived his Miranda rights, and the Fifth Amendment privilege — which governs pre-charge custodial interrogation — was fully satisfied.
Why it's wrong
Choice A is not the credited answer for this item.
18132_daniel-ministry · CRIMINAL · Choice BYes, because Daniel had retained counsel and affirmatively invoked his right to have counsel present before any interrogation occurred.
Why it's wrong
Choice B is not the credited answer for this item.
18132_daniel-ministry · CRIMINAL · Choice CYes, because any statement taken from a defendant who has retained counsel is automatically inadmissible unless counsel was notified and given the opportunity to be present.
Why it's wrong
Choice C is not the credited answer for this item.
Practice the questions that use this trap as a distractor and get full Wrong Answer Forensics on submit.
Practice questions using this trap →