In Court Identification Is Never Suppressible
This trap appears as a wrong-answer choice in 1 active question. Spotting how it is built is the repair: read each example's “why it's attractive” before the “why it's wrong.”
Subject distribution
- CRIMINAL1
Example wrong choices
14590_hallelujah_handbell_booth · CRIMINAL · Choice BYes, because the improper out-of-court identification has necessarily tainted any in-court identification.
Why it's attractive
The word necessarily makes the answer too strong.
Why it's wrong
The word necessarily makes the answer too strong.
14590_hallelujah_handbell_booth · CRIMINAL · Choice CNo, because suppression of in-court testimony is not a proper remedy, even though the out-of-court identification was improper.
Why it's attractive
The answer admits the out-of-court identification problem but cuts off the remedy entirely.
Why it's wrong
The answer admits the out-of-court identification problem but cuts off the remedy entirely.
14590_hallelujah_handbell_booth · CRIMINAL · Choice DNo, because the out-of-court identification was not improper.
Why it's attractive
The answer ignores the one-photo procedure and the police confidence cue.
Why it's wrong
The answer ignores the one-photo procedure and the police confidence cue.
Practice the questions that use this trap as a distractor and get full Wrong Answer Forensics on submit.
Practice questions using this trap →