Incorrect Quantity Wipeout
This trap appears as a wrong-answer choice in 1 active question. Spotting how it is built is the repair: read each example's “why it's attractive” before the “why it's wrong.”
Subject distribution
- Contracts1
Example wrong choices
20536_scripture_journals_quantity_cap · CONTRACTS · Choice AAll 1,200 journals, because the oral agreement controls once the signed memo shows a deal existed.
Why it's attractive
uses the memo to prove a deal existed, then jumps to the larger oral number
Why it's wrong
uses the memo to prove a deal existed, then jumps to the larger oral number
20536_scripture_journals_quantity_cap · CONTRACTS · Choice BNone, because the memo misstated the quantity agreed to orally.
Why it's attractive
treats the wrong number as if it ruins the entire memo
Why it's wrong
treats the wrong number as if it ruins the entire memo
20536_scripture_journals_quantity_cap · CONTRACTS · Choice CAll 1,200 journals, but only if Lydia proves the oral quantity by clear and convincing evidence.
Why it's attractive
turns a quantity-cap rule into an evidence-burden rule
Why it's wrong
turns a quantity-cap rule into an evidence-burden rule
Practice the questions that use this trap as a distractor and get full Wrong Answer Forensics on submit.
Practice questions using this trap →