Intent Element Missing
This trap appears as a wrong-answer choice in 1 active question. Spotting how it is built is the repair: read each example's “why it's attractive” before the “why it's wrong.”
Subject distribution
- Torts1
Example wrong choices
15123_christian-bookstore-locked · TORTS · Choice BNo, because it was unusual for anyone to remain in the bookstore after closing.
Why it's attractive
The unusualness of the circumstances doesn't answer the call about false imprisonment; this is a negligence frame
Why it's wrong
The unusualness of the circumstances doesn't answer the call about false imprisonment; this is a negligence frame
15123_christian-bookstore-locked · TORTS · Choice CYes, because Lydia was aware of being confined.
Why it's attractive
Awareness is necessary but not sufficient; this choice ignores the intent element
Why it's wrong
Awareness is necessary but not sufficient; this choice ignores the intent element
15123_christian-bookstore-locked · TORTS · Choice DYes, because the retreat coordinator should have checked to make sure no one was still in the bookstore before locking the doors.
Why it's attractive
'Should have checked' is a negligence standard, not an intentional tort standard
Why it's wrong
'Should have checked' is a negligence standard, not an intentional tort standard
Practice the questions that use this trap as a distractor and get full Wrong Answer Forensics on submit.
Practice questions using this trap →