Intent Without Apprehension
This trap appears as a wrong-answer choice in 1 active question. Spotting how it is built is the repair: read each example's “why it's attractive” before the “why it's wrong.”
Subject distribution
- Torts1
Example wrong choices
15097_sleeping-apprehension · TORTS · Choice AYes, because Peter intended to inflict serious bodily harm on Daniel.
Why it's attractive
The choice proves intent but the call asks whether Daniel prevails — intent alone doesn't establish assault.
Why it's wrong
The choice proves intent but the call asks whether Daniel prevails — intent alone doesn't establish assault.
15097_sleeping-apprehension · TORTS · Choice BYes, because it was reasonable for Daniel to feel afraid after learning what Peter had planned.
Why it's attractive
The choice describes fear after learning the story, but the call is about what happened at the time.
Why it's wrong
The choice describes fear after learning the story, but the call is about what happened at the time.
15097_sleeping-apprehension · TORTS · Choice DNo, because Peter never made physical contact with Daniel.
Why it's attractive
The choice says no contact = no assault, but assault doesn't require contact.
Why it's wrong
The choice says no contact = no assault, but assault doesn't require contact.
Practice the questions that use this trap as a distractor and get full Wrong Answer Forensics on submit.
Practice questions using this trap →