Invented Easement Requirement
This trap appears as a wrong-answer choice in 1 active question. Spotting how it is built is the repair: read each example's “why it's attractive” before the “why it's wrong.”
Subject distribution
- Real Property1
Example wrong choices
18312_hymn_studio_trench · REAL_PROPERTY · Choice AOnly that the excavation made Ruth's cottage less valuable, because nuisance replaces support rules.
Why it's attractive
The call asks what support-rule proof is required, not whether the excavation is a nuisance.
Why it's wrong
The call asks what support-rule proof is required, not whether the excavation is a nuisance.
18312_hymn_studio_trench · REAL_PROPERTY · Choice BOnly that Barnabas excavated and the cottage was damaged, because support liability is always strict.
Why it's attractive
The word 'always' cannot survive the stem's natural-land/improvement-weight split.
Why it's wrong
The word 'always' cannot survive the stem's natural-land/improvement-weight split.
18312_hymn_studio_trench · REAL_PROPERTY · Choice DThat Ruth held an express easement for support in Barnabas's parcel.
Why it's attractive
The stem asks support liability, not whether Ruth owns an express support easement.
Why it's wrong
The stem asks support liability, not whether Ruth owns an express support easement.
Practice the questions that use this trap as a distractor and get full Wrong Answer Forensics on submit.
Practice questions using this trap →