Invented Future Requirement
This trap appears as a wrong-answer choice in 1 active question. Spotting how it is built is the repair: read each example's “why it's attractive” before the “why it's wrong.”
Subject distribution
- CRIMINAL1
Example wrong choices
18123_barnabas-loading-dock · CRIMINAL · Choice ANo, because a low price is never relevant to knowledge
Why it's attractive
'Never' flags an absolute overclaim. Low price is admissible circumstantial evidence of knowledge. Cut via EAR heuristic.
Why it's wrong
'Never' flags an absolute overclaim. Low price is admissible circumstantial evidence of knowledge. Cut via EAR heuristic.
18123_barnabas-loading-dock · CRIMINAL · Choice BNo, unless Barnabas later sells the grain
Why it's attractive
Adds a post-receipt condition. Requires Gold Key to defeat: receiving stolen property is complete at the moment of knowing receipt — no later sale required.
Why it's wrong
Adds a post-receipt condition. Requires Gold Key to defeat: receiving stolen property is complete at the moment of knowing receipt — no later sale required.
18123_barnabas-loading-dock · CRIMINAL · Choice DNo, because only the original thief can commit a property offense
Why it's attractive
Flatly misstates who can commit the offense. Requires knowing receiving stolen property is a separate crime from the underlying theft.
Why it's wrong
Flatly misstates who can commit the offense. Requires knowing receiving stolen property is a separate crime from the underlying theft.
Practice the questions that use this trap as a distractor and get full Wrong Answer Forensics on submit.
Practice questions using this trap →