Invented Procedural Rule
This trap appears as a wrong-answer choice in 1 active question. Spotting how it is built is the repair: read each example's “why it's attractive” before the “why it's wrong.”
Subject distribution
- Evidence1
Example wrong choices
22269_lakeside-boat-collision · EVIDENCE · Choice BYes, because the account is a prior consistent statement.
Why it's attractive
Right area, real rule, wrong variant — prior-consistent exemption needs a credibility attack that never happened.
Why it's wrong
Right area, real rule, wrong variant — prior-consistent exemption needs a credibility attack that never happened.
22269_lakeside-boat-collision · EVIDENCE · Choice CYes, because the account is part of a public record.
Why it's attractive
True that it sits in a public record, but the embedded account is its own hearsay layer needing its own exception.
Why it's wrong
True that it sits in a public record, but the embedded account is its own hearsay layer needing its own exception.
22269_lakeside-boat-collision · EVIDENCE · Choice DNo, because the account can only be testified to by the waterway officer.
Why it's attractive
Invents a 'only the officer can relay it' rule; the officer repeating it would be hearsay too.
Why it's wrong
Invents a 'only the officer can relay it' rule; the officer repeating it would be hearsay too.
Practice the questions that use this trap as a distractor and get full Wrong Answer Forensics on submit.
Practice questions using this trap →