← All traps
ArchitectureObserved in bank

Jurisdictional Call

This trap appears as a wrong-answer choice in 1 active question. Spotting how it is built is the repair: read each example's “why it's attractive” before the “why it's wrong.”

Subject distribution

  • Civil Procedure1

Example wrong choices

  • 22863_worship_leader_tortious_interference · CIVIL_PROCEDURE · Choice ANo, because the probate exception reserves to state probate courts the right to adjudicate claims touching a decedent's estate.

    Why it's attractive

    The probate exception is narrower than "any claim touching a probate matter."

    Why it's wrong

    The probate exception is narrower than "any claim touching a probate matter."

  • 22863_worship_leader_tortious_interference · CIVIL_PROCEDURE · Choice BNo, because the state probate court found the will to be valid.

    Why it's attractive

    The state court's will ruling is a merits question, not a jurisdictional one.

    Why it's wrong

    The state court's will ruling is a merits question, not a jurisdictional one.

  • 22863_worship_leader_tortious_interference · CIVIL_PROCEDURE · Choice DYes, because Margaret's estate contained property located in several different states.

    Why it's attractive

    The geographic location of estate property does not create federal subject matter jurisdiction.

    Why it's wrong

    The geographic location of estate property does not create federal subject matter jurisdiction.

Practice the questions that use this trap as a distractor and get full Wrong Answer Forensics on submit.

Practice questions using this trap →
Jurisdictional Call — Trap Taxonomy | BarMatrix