Later No Discount Note Erases Prior Dealings
This trap appears as a wrong-answer choice in 1 active question. Spotting how it is built is the repair: read each example's “why it's attractive” before the “why it's wrong.”
Subject distribution
- Contracts1
Example wrong choices
14378_prayer_journal_discount · CONTRACTS · Choice ABarnabas's notice retracting his earlier waiver controls, and Lydia is entitled to no discount.
Why it's attractive
The invoice had no discount term to waive, and the note came after the delivery procedure.
Why it's wrong
The invoice had no discount term to waive, and the note came after the delivery procedure.
14378_prayer_journal_discount · CONTRACTS · Choice BThe signed invoice controls, and Lydia is entitled to no discount because of the parol evidence rule.
Why it's attractive
The writing is silent about discounts, so the answer must address explanation or supplementation, not contradiction.
Why it's wrong
The writing is silent about discounts, so the answer must address explanation or supplementation, not contradiction.
14378_prayer_journal_discount · CONTRACTS · Choice DThe custom of the trade controls, and Lydia is entitled to take a 2% discount if she pays within 10 days.
Why it's attractive
The answer chooses the broader trade custom even though the stem gives a specific repeated pattern between these parties.
Why it's wrong
The answer chooses the broader trade custom even though the stem gives a specific repeated pattern between these parties.
Practice the questions that use this trap as a distractor and get full Wrong Answer Forensics on submit.
Practice questions using this trap →