Lien Red Herring
This trap appears as a wrong-answer choice in 1 active question. Spotting how it is built is the repair: read each example's “why it's attractive” before the “why it's wrong.”
Subject distribution
- Real Property1
Example wrong choices
14985_hillside-vineyard-wall · REAL_PROPERTY · Choice Alose, because the agreement, as a matter of law, was mutually beneficial to both Peter and Barnabas.
Why it's attractive
'mutually beneficial' is a fairness slogan, not the legal test
Why it's wrong
'mutually beneficial' is a fairness slogan, not the legal test
14985_hillside-vineyard-wall · REAL_PROPERTY · Choice Blose, because Barnabas was in sole possession of the vineyard at the time the agreement was signed.
Why it's attractive
sole possession is true but does not bind the absent co-tenant's ownership interest
Why it's wrong
sole possession is true but does not bind the absent co-tenant's ownership interest
14985_hillside-vineyard-wall · REAL_PROPERTY · Choice Dwin, because the credit union was not a party to the agreement.
Why it's attractive
reaches 'win' but on the lender's absence, which is not why Peter prevails
Why it's wrong
reaches 'win' but on the lender's absence, which is not why Peter prevails
Practice the questions that use this trap as a distractor and get full Wrong Answer Forensics on submit.
Practice questions using this trap →