Mens Rea
This trap appears as a wrong-answer choice in 1 active question. Spotting how it is built is the repair: read each example's “why it's attractive” before the “why it's wrong.”
Subject distribution
- CRIMINAL1
Example wrong choices
18812_joppa_deacon_burglary · CRIMINAL · Choice AIt provides no defense because voluntary intoxication is never a relevant consideration for determining a defendant's mens rea.
Why it's attractive
Incorrect because voluntary intoxication IS relevant to specific intent elements.
Why it's wrong
Incorrect because voluntary intoxication IS relevant to specific intent elements.
18812_joppa_deacon_burglary · CRIMINAL · Choice BIt serves as a defense only if Timothy can prove that his intoxication was caused by another's trickery or coercion.
Why it's attractive
Incorrect because the defense applies to voluntary intoxication for the purpose of negating specific intent.
Why it's wrong
Incorrect because the defense applies to voluntary intoxication for the purpose of negating specific intent.
18812_joppa_deacon_burglary · CRIMINAL · Choice DIt results in an automatic acquittal for any and all criminal offenses arising from his entry into the room.
Why it's attractive
Incorrect because the defense only negates the specific element, not overall criminality.
Why it's wrong
Incorrect because the defense only negates the specific element, not overall criminality.
Practice the questions that use this trap as a distractor and get full Wrong Answer Forensics on submit.
Practice questions using this trap →