← All traps
ArchitectureObserved in bank

Merits Preference Overclaim

This trap appears as a wrong-answer choice in 1 active question. Spotting how it is built is the repair: read each example's “why it's attractive” before the “why it's wrong.”

Subject distribution

  • Civil Procedure1

Example wrong choices

  • 18669_mary_negligence_survival · CIVIL_PROCEDURE · Choice AAlways continue the claim because federal courts prefer merits decisions.

    Why it's attractive

    The student reaches for the merits-preference intuition: federal courts like to decide cases on the merits. The Gold Key rejects the intuition: Erie requires application of state substantive law, and the forum state's no-survival rule means the claim does not exist to be decided on the merits.

    Why it's wrong

    The student reaches for the merits-preference intuition: federal courts like to decide cases on the merits. The Gold Key rejects the intuition: Erie requires application of state substantive law, and the forum state's no-survival rule means the claim does not exist to be decided on the merits.

  • 18669_mary_negligence_survival · CIVIL_PROCEDURE · Choice BUse the defendant's home-state survival rule automatically.

    Why it's attractive

    The student imports a defendant-residence rule. The breaker: Klaxon requires the federal court to apply the forum state's choice-of-law rules, not the defendant's home-state rule automatically.

    Why it's wrong

    The student imports a defendant-residence rule. The breaker: Klaxon requires the federal court to apply the forum state's choice-of-law rules, not the defendant's home-state rule automatically.

  • 18669_mary_negligence_survival · CIVIL_PROCEDURE · Choice DDismiss only if diversity is destroyed by the death.

    Why it's attractive

    The student confuses the survival question with a diversity-jurisdiction question. The breaker: the Erie analysis turns on the substantive survival of the claim, not on whether diversity is preserved.

    Why it's wrong

    The student confuses the survival question with a diversity-jurisdiction question. The breaker: the Erie analysis turns on the substantive survival of the claim, not on whether diversity is preserved.

Practice the questions that use this trap as a distractor and get full Wrong Answer Forensics on submit.

Practice questions using this trap →
Merits Preference Overclaim — Trap Taxonomy | BarMatrix