Multiple Hearsay
This trap appears as a wrong-answer choice in 1 active question. Spotting how it is built is the repair: read each example's “why it's attractive” before the “why it's wrong.”
Subject distribution
- Evidence1
Example wrong choices
14764_red_sea_mat · EVIDENCE · Choice Aadmissible, to prove that the defendant had notice of the defect.
Why it's attractive
The answer follows the useful notice fact but skips the separate retelling layer.
Why it's wrong
The answer follows the useful notice fact but skips the separate retelling layer.
14764_red_sea_mat · EVIDENCE · Choice Cadmissible, to prove both that the mat was defective and that the defendant had notice of the defect.
Why it's attractive
The answer tries to use both possible purposes even though each purpose still has to survive layer-by-layer.
Why it's wrong
The answer tries to use both possible purposes even though each purpose still has to survive layer-by-layer.
14764_red_sea_mat · EVIDENCE · Choice Dadmissible, to prove that the mat was defective.
Why it's attractive
To prove the mat was defective, the statement is used for truth.
Why it's wrong
To prove the mat was defective, the statement is used for truth.
Practice the questions that use this trap as a distractor and get full Wrong Answer Forensics on submit.
Practice questions using this trap →