← All traps
ArchitectureObserved in bank

Murder

This trap appears as a wrong-answer choice in 2 active questions. Spotting how it is built is the repair: read each example's “why it's attractive” before the “why it's wrong.”

Subject distribution

  • CRIMINAL2

Example wrong choices

  • 19864_vineyard_malice · CRIMINAL · Choice AVoluntary manslaughter, because Silas was acting under the heat of passion caused by the destruction of his livelihood.

    Why it's attractive

    Incorrect because property damage is not legally adequate provocation to reduce murder to manslaughter.

    Why it's wrong

    Incorrect because property damage is not legally adequate provocation to reduce murder to manslaughter.

  • 19864_vineyard_malice · CRIMINAL · Choice CInvoluntary manslaughter, because Silas expressly disclaimed any intent to kill Malchus.

    Why it's attractive

    Incorrect; a specific intent to kill is not the only way to satisfy the malice requirement.

    Why it's wrong

    Incorrect; a specific intent to kill is not the only way to satisfy the malice requirement.

  • 19864_vineyard_malice · CRIMINAL · Choice DNo homicide offense, because the resulting death exceeded the specific harm Silas intended to cause.

    Why it's attractive

    Incorrect; a defendant is liable for the death if they act with the malice of intent to cause SBI.

    Why it's wrong

    Incorrect; a defendant is liable for the death if they act with the malice of intent to cause SBI.

  • 21605_joppa_balcony_malice · CRIMINAL · Choice AYes, because voluntary intoxication prevents a defendant from forming any level of malice required for a murder conviction.

    Why it's attractive

    Incorrect because voluntary intoxication only potentially negates specific intent, not general malice or recklessness.

    Why it's wrong

    Incorrect because voluntary intoxication only potentially negates specific intent, not general malice or recklessness.

  • 21605_joppa_balcony_malice · CRIMINAL · Choice CNo, but only because the law dictates that voluntary intoxication is never a relevant consideration for any criminal offense.

    Why it's attractive

    Incorrect because intoxication IS relevant to specific-intent crimes.

    Why it's wrong

    Incorrect because intoxication IS relevant to specific-intent crimes.

  • 21605_joppa_balcony_malice · CRIMINAL · Choice DYes, because depraved-heart murder is a specific-intent crime that requires a clear-headed purpose to kill.

    Why it's attractive

    Incorrect because depraved-heart murder is NOT a specific-intent crime.

    Why it's wrong

    Incorrect because depraved-heart murder is NOT a specific-intent crime.

Practice the questions that use this trap as a distractor and get full Wrong Answer Forensics on submit.

Practice questions using this trap →
Murder — Trap Taxonomy | BarMatrix