← All traps
MisconceptionObserved in bank

Murder Requires Intent To Kill

This trap appears as a wrong-answer choice in 3 active questions. Spotting how it is built is the repair: read each example's “why it's attractive” before the “why it's wrong.”

Subject distribution

  • CRIMINAL3

Example wrong choices

  • 14670_brass_handbell_pageant · CRIMINAL · Choice Abecause the jury found that the killing occurred in the course of an aggravated assault.

    Why it's attractive

    The choice uses a real felony label but ignores the word independent.

    Why it's wrong

    The choice uses a real felony label but ignores the word independent.

  • 14670_brass_handbell_pageant · CRIMINAL · Choice Conly because the jury found that Daniel intended to kill Peter.

    Why it's attractive

    The word only makes one malice route swallow the other.

    Why it's wrong

    The word only makes one malice route swallow the other.

  • 14670_brass_handbell_pageant · CRIMINAL · Choice Donly because the jury found that Daniel did not act in a rage provoked by Peter's accusation.

    Why it's attractive

    This choice points to a missing manslaughter mitigation, not the murder element.

    Why it's wrong

    This choice points to a missing manslaughter mitigation, not the murder element.

  • 19572_gideon-oxen-stampede · CRIMINAL · Choice AFirst-degree murder, because intentionally startling animals into a crowd constitutes felony murder

    Why it's attractive

    Invents a felony murder predicate. Goading animals into a crowd does not constitute a qualifying predicate felony. Depraved-heart murder is the better-supported and cleaner charge.

    Why it's wrong

    Invents a felony murder predicate. Goading animals into a crowd does not constitute a qualifying predicate felony. Depraved-heart murder is the better-supported and cleaner charge.

  • 19572_gideon-oxen-stampede · CRIMINAL · Choice BInvoluntary manslaughter only, because Gideon did not intend to hit anyone

    Why it's attractive

    Focuses on lack of intent-to-kill as the limiting element. Depraved-heart murder does not require intent to kill — conscious disregard of extreme risk with extreme indifference is sufficient. Defeated by GK-CRIMINAL-DEPRAVED-HEART-01.

    Why it's wrong

    Focuses on lack of intent-to-kill as the limiting element. Depraved-heart murder does not require intent to kill — conscious disregard of extreme risk with extreme indifference is sufficient. Defeated by GK-CRIMINAL-DEPRAVED-HEART-01.

  • 19572_gideon-oxen-stampede · CRIMINAL · Choice CNo homicide liability, because the workers could have stepped aside

    Why it's attractive

    Substitutes victim's ability to move (common-sense autonomy) for the legal standard (proximate causation). A victim's failure to avoid an extreme risk created by the defendant is not a superseding cause that negates liability.

    Why it's wrong

    Substitutes victim's ability to move (common-sense autonomy) for the legal standard (proximate causation). A victim's failure to avoid an extreme risk created by the defendant is not a superseding cause that negates liability.

  • 20931_candlestick_strikes · CRIMINAL · Choice BYes, for first-degree murder, because the repeated striking shows premeditation.

    Why it's attractive

    The stem says nothing about thinking about killing before hitting. Premeditation = prior reflection about killing, not just many hits.

    Why it's wrong

    The stem says nothing about thinking about killing before hitting. Premeditation = prior reflection about killing, not just many hits.

  • 20931_candlestick_strikes · CRIMINAL · Choice CYes, for involuntary manslaughter, because Peter did not intend to kill.

    Why it's attractive

    The call asks 'murder?' — involuntary manslaughter is a different charge. That alone makes it non-responsive.

    Why it's wrong

    The call asks 'murder?' — involuntary manslaughter is a different charge. That alone makes it non-responsive.

  • 20931_candlestick_strikes · CRIMINAL · Choice DNo, because Peter lacked intent to kill, which is required for murder.

    Why it's attractive

    The Gold Key explicitly says GBH intent = malice = murder. D reverses that: it says only intent to kill counts, which is false.

    Why it's wrong

    The Gold Key explicitly says GBH intent = malice = murder. D reverses that: it says only intent to kill counts, which is false.

Practice the questions that use this trap as a distractor and get full Wrong Answer Forensics on submit.

Practice questions using this trap →
Murder Requires Intent To Kill — Trap Taxonomy | BarMatrix