← All traps
ArchitectureObserved in bank

Overclaim Absolute

This trap appears as a wrong-answer choice in 2 active questions. Spotting how it is built is the repair: read each example's “why it's attractive” before the “why it's wrong.”

Subject distribution

  • Evidence2

Example wrong choices

  • 17955_pottery-sale · EVIDENCE · Choice ASustain the objection only if Hannah first testified that she is peaceful.

    Why it's attractive

    The choice makes admissibility turn on a condition (Hannah testifying she is peaceful) that does not govern the initial admissibility of reputation evidence under 608(a)

    Why it's wrong

    The choice makes admissibility turn on a condition (Hannah testifying she is peaceful) that does not govern the initial admissibility of reputation evidence under 608(a)

  • 17955_pottery-sale · EVIDENCE · Choice BOverrule the objection because any negative character trait may be used to attack credibility.

    Why it's attractive

    The word 'any' is an absolute overclaim; 608(a) limits impeachment to truthfulness, not all negative traits

    Why it's wrong

    The word 'any' is an absolute overclaim; 608(a) limits impeachment to truthfulness, not all negative traits

  • 17955_pottery-sale · EVIDENCE · Choice DOverrule the objection because careless people are less likely to observe accurately.

    Why it's attractive

    The evidence was offered to attack character, not perception; this choice reframes the issue

    Why it's wrong

    The evidence was offered to attack character, not perception; this choice reframes the issue

  • 22221_guardian_consultation · EVIDENCE · Choice AYes, because the court's appointment of Hannah as Nora's legal guardian made Hannah's presence at the consultation necessary.

    Why it's wrong

    Choice A is not the credited answer for this item.

  • 22221_guardian_consultation · EVIDENCE · Choice BNo, because David never agreed to represent Nora and Hannah.

    Why it's wrong

    Choice B is not the credited answer for this item.

  • 22221_guardian_consultation · EVIDENCE · Choice DNo, because Nora and Hannah are co-defendants in the action.

    Why it's wrong

    Choice D is not the credited answer for this item.

Practice the questions that use this trap as a distractor and get full Wrong Answer Forensics on submit.

Practice questions using this trap →