Promises Are Not Covered Until Paid
This trap appears as a wrong-answer choice in 1 active question. Spotting how it is built is the repair: read each example's “why it's attractive” before the “why it's wrong.”
Subject distribution
- Evidence1
Example wrong choices
19407_scripture_art_burn_clinic · EVIDENCE · Choice AExclude the statement only if an actual disputed claim had already arisen.
Why it's attractive
disputed-claim language points to compromise negotiations, not medical-payment offers
Why it's wrong
disputed-claim language points to compromise negotiations, not medical-payment offers
19407_scripture_art_burn_clinic · EVIDENCE · Choice BAdmit the statement because Rule 409 covers bills the studio actually pays, not promises to pay them.
Why it's attractive
the answer narrows Rule 409 to payments only
Why it's wrong
the answer narrows Rule 409 to payments only
19407_scripture_art_burn_clinic · EVIDENCE · Choice CAdmit the statement because it shows Paul thought the studio was responsible for Timothy's injury.
Why it's attractive
the choice uses the liability inference as the reason to admit
Why it's wrong
the choice uses the liability inference as the reason to admit
Practice the questions that use this trap as a distractor and get full Wrong Answer Forensics on submit.
Practice questions using this trap →