ArchitectureObserved in bank

Right Result Wrong Reason

This trap appears as a wrong-answer choice in 54 active questions. Spotting how it is built is the repair: read each example's “why it's attractive” before the “why it's wrong.”

Subject distribution

Evidence13
Contracts10
Real Property10
Constitutional Law9
CRIMINAL9
Torts3

Example wrong choices

first 20

14229_daily-bread-depot · CONSTITUTIONAL_LAW · Choice AUnconstitutional, because the burden was on the city to demonstrate that this condition was necessary to vindicate a compelling governmental interest, and the city failed to meet that burden.
Why it's attractive
Strict scrutiny language answers a neighboring constitutional question, not this exaction.
Why it's wrong
Strict scrutiny language answers a neighboring constitutional question, not this exaction.
14229_daily-bread-depot · CONSTITUTIONAL_LAW · Choice CConstitutional, because the burden was on Daniel to demonstrate that there was no rational relationship between this condition and a legitimate governmental interest, and Daniel could not do so because the condition is reasonably related to improving the lives of families and children in the city.
Why it's attractive
Rational basis is the wrong lane once the city demands a give-back for a permit.
Why it's wrong
Rational basis is the wrong lane once the city demands a give-back for a permit.
14229_daily-bread-depot · CONSTITUTIONAL_LAW · Choice DConstitutional, because the burden was on Daniel to demonstrate that this condition was not necessary to vindicate a compelling governmental interest, and Daniel failed to meet that burden.
Why it's attractive
The owner does not carry the city's exaction burden.
Why it's wrong
The owner does not carry the city's exaction burden.
14263_good_samaritan_market · CONSTITUTIONAL_LAW · Choice AYes, because the Full Faith and Credit Clause requires the court to enforce the budget section according to its terms.
Why it's attractive
No other-state law, record, or judgment appears in the stem.
Why it's wrong
No other-state law, record, or judgment appears in the stem.
14263_good_samaritan_market · CONSTITUTIONAL_LAW · Choice BNo, because the section attaches consequences to conduct Lydia and Barnabas completed before the section was enacted.
Why it's attractive
Past conduct is visible, but the stem also gives named people, loss of pay, legislature, and no trial.
Why it's wrong
Past conduct is visible, but the stem also gives named people, loss of pay, legislature, and no trial.
14263_good_samaritan_market · CONSTITUTIONAL_LAW · Choice DYes, because the Eleventh Amendment gives the state legislature plenary authority to decide how state funds for the institute will be spent.
Why it's attractive
The answer talks about immunity-style state power instead of the named-person punishment problem.
Why it's wrong
The answer talks about immunity-style state power instead of the named-person punishment problem.
14275_lantern_launch_observatory · CONSTITUTIONAL_LAW · Choice AYes, because once the League invited the public to the officer-installation ceremony, the Fourteenth Amendment barred it from excluding women from any leadership role connected to that event.
Why it's attractive
The answer turns public attendance into a constitutional trigger without a state decision about the leadership rule.
Why it's wrong
The answer turns public attendance into a constitutional trigger without a state decision about the leadership rule.
14275_lantern_launch_observatory · CONSTITUTIONAL_LAW · Choice CNo, because freedom of association under the Fourteenth Amendment prohibits the city from placing any conditions on a private group's use of city facilities.
Why it's attractive
The word "any" is too absolute; the answer does not track the plaintiff's sole state-action claim.
Why it's wrong
The word "any" is too absolute; the answer does not track the plaintiff's sole state-action claim.
14275_lantern_launch_observatory · CONSTITUTIONAL_LAW · Choice DYes, because renting the city observatory for the officer-installation ceremony subjects the League's leadership rule to the Fourteenth Amendment.
Why it's attractive
City property is visible, but the answer skips the missing attribution bridge.
Why it's wrong
City property is visible, but the answer skips the missing attribution bridge.
14330_new_zion_battery_barn · CONSTITUTIONAL_LAW · Choice AYes, because the federal government's legitimate needs are satisfied when the unlicensed state processor satisfies most federal licensing standards in practice.
Why it's attractive
The answer says most standards are enough, but the stem's federal command requires licensed facilities.
Why it's wrong
The answer says most standards are enough, but the stem's federal command requires licensed facilities.
14330_new_zion_battery_barn · CONSTITUTIONAL_LAW · Choice BNo, because some of the batteries came from equipment used solely in the state's commercial operations.
Why it's attractive
The answer turns on the commercial-source fact, but the call asks whether the state can keep using the unlicensed facility for covered batteries generally.
Why it's wrong
The answer turns on the commercial-source fact, but the call asks whether the state can keep using the unlicensed facility for covered batteries generally.
14330_new_zion_battery_barn · CONSTITUTIONAL_LAW · Choice DYes, because some of the batteries came from equipment used by the state in the performance of core state governmental functions such as law enforcement.
Why it's attractive
The answer uses police equipment to create a state-sovereignty shield; the Gold Key blocks that shield for valid federal regulation of state activity.
Why it's wrong
The answer uses police equipment to create a state-sovereignty shield; the Gold Key blocks that shield for valid federal regulation of state activity.
14342_scripturequest_finals_tax · CONSTITUTIONAL_LAW · Choice Aunconstitutional, because a 48% tax is likely to reduce attendance at championship game tournaments and therefore is not rationally related to Congress's legitimate interest in reducing the federal budget deficit.
Why it's attractive
It assumes reduced attendance defeats revenue fit.
Why it's wrong
It assumes reduced attendance defeats revenue fit.
14342_scripturequest_finals_tax · CONSTITUTIONAL_LAW · Choice Bconstitutional, because the compelling national interest in reducing the federal budget deficit justifies the tax as a temporary emergency measure.
Why it's attractive
It imports compelling-interest review into a federal revenue-tax call.
Why it's wrong
It imports compelling-interest review into a federal revenue-tax call.
14342_scripturequest_finals_tax · CONSTITUTIONAL_LAW · Choice Cunconstitutional, because Congress violates the equal protection component of the Fifth Amendment by singling out championship game tournaments for the tax while leaving other ticketed entertainment events untaxed.
Why it's attractive
It treats not taxing every similar event as constitutional failure.
Why it's wrong
It treats not taxing every similar event as constitutional failure.
14343_esther_home_fire_readiness · CONSTITUTIONAL_LAW · Choice BNo, because Congress has not specifically authorized the creation and support of this new federal advisory commission.
Why it's attractive
Turns statutory silence into a categorical prohibition.
Why it's wrong
Turns statutory silence into a categorical prohibition.
14343_esther_home_fire_readiness · CONSTITUTIONAL_LAW · Choice CNo, because residential fire readiness is a traditional local safety function reserved to the states by the Tenth Amendment.
Why it's attractive
Treats local tradition as constitutional exclusivity.
Why it's wrong
Treats local tradition as constitutional exclusivity.
14343_esther_home_fire_readiness · CONSTITUTIONAL_LAW · Choice DYes, because the President has plenary authority to protect the health, safety, and welfare of people in the United States.
Why it's attractive
The word plenary is the overclaim.
Why it's wrong
The word plenary is the overclaim.
14352_mercy_timing_act · CONSTITUTIONAL_LAW · Choice Bconstitutional, because Congress enacted it over the President's veto by a two-thirds vote of each house.
Why it's attractive
The answer talks about how the bill passed, not whether Congress may regulate presidential pardons.
Why it's wrong
The answer talks about how the bill passed, not whether Congress may regulate presidential pardons.
14352_mercy_timing_act · CONSTITUTIONAL_LAW · Choice Cunconstitutional, because a presidential veto based on constitutional objections may be overridden only after ratification by three-fourths of the states.
Why it's attractive
The three-fourths-states requirement belongs to amendments, not veto overrides.
Why it's wrong
The three-fourths-states requirement belongs to amendments, not veto overrides.

Practice the questions that use this trap as a distractor and get full Wrong Answer Forensics on submit.

Practice questions using this trap →