Setting Over Confidentiality
This trap appears as a wrong-answer choice in 1 active question. Spotting how it is built is the repair: read each example's “why it's attractive” before the “why it's wrong.”
Subject distribution
- Evidence1
Example wrong choices
21796_telehealth_prayer_support · EVIDENCE · Choice BSustain the objection, because the statement was made during a licensed psychotherapist's telehealth appointment.
Why it's attractive
The choice stops at the appointment setting and never answers who heard the statement.
Why it's wrong
The choice stops at the appointment setting and never answers who heard the statement.
21796_telehealth_prayer_support · EVIDENCE · Choice CSustain the objection, because support friends are always treated as part of therapy.
Why it's attractive
The word "always" overclaims the rule, especially when the stem says Barnabas was not needed.
Why it's wrong
The word "always" overclaims the rule, especially when the stem says Barnabas was not needed.
21796_telehealth_prayer_support · EVIDENCE · Choice DOverrule the objection only if Dr. Lydia also testifies about the session.
Why it's attractive
The choice adds a witness condition not asked by the call.
Why it's wrong
The choice adds a witness condition not asked by the call.
Practice the questions that use this trap as a distractor and get full Wrong Answer Forensics on submit.
Practice questions using this trap →