Undercover Status Defeats Solicitation
This trap appears as a wrong-answer choice in 1 active question. Spotting how it is built is the repair: read each example's “why it's attractive” before the “why it's wrong.”
Subject distribution
- CRIMINAL1
Example wrong choices
20197_journaling_locksmith · CRIMINAL · Choice BYes, because Daniel never intended to commit the burglary.
Why it's attractive
The choice points to Daniel's true intent, but the solicitation call turns on Ruth's intentional request.
Why it's wrong
The choice points to Daniel's true intent, but the solicitation call turns on Ruth's intentional request.
20197_journaling_locksmith · CRIMINAL · Choice CNo, but only if Daniel had already obtained a warrant.
Why it's attractive
The warrant condition sounds official, but the call is whether Ruth committed solicitation, not whether Daniel had search authority.
Why it's wrong
The warrant condition sounds official, but the call is whether Ruth committed solicitation, not whether Daniel had search authority.
20197_journaling_locksmith · CRIMINAL · Choice DYes, because solicitation requires two guilty parties.
Why it's attractive
The choice imports a two-guilty-parties idea into solicitation.
Why it's wrong
The choice imports a two-guilty-parties idea into solicitation.
Practice the questions that use this trap as a distractor and get full Wrong Answer Forensics on submit.
Practice questions using this trap →