← All traps
MisconceptionObserved in bank

Wrong Doctrine Frame

This trap appears as a wrong-answer choice in 2 active questions. Spotting how it is built is the repair: read each example's “why it's attractive” before the “why it's wrong.”

Subject distribution

  • CRIMINAL2

Example wrong choices

  • 19361_threshing-floor · CRIMINAL · Choice ASuppress the evidence, because an arrest warrant is required before police may inspect anyone's trash

    Why it's attractive

    No arrest-warrant requirement for trash. Issue is reasonable expectation of privacy.

    Why it's wrong

    No arrest-warrant requirement for trash. Issue is reasonable expectation of privacy.

  • 19361_threshing-floor · CRIMINAL · Choice BAdmit the evidence, but only if the sanitation collector first gave police consent to search the bags

    Why it's attractive

    Consent is a real 4A doctrine but the wrong one here. Analysis turns on abandonment, not consent.

    Why it's wrong

    Consent is a real 4A doctrine but the wrong one here. Analysis turns on abandonment, not consent.

  • 19361_threshing-floor · CRIMINAL · Choice CSuppress the evidence, because opaque bags preserve a reasonable expectation of privacy even when placed at the curb

    Why it's attractive

    Greenwood explicitly rejected opacity as preserving privacy at the curb.

    Why it's wrong

    Greenwood explicitly rejected opacity as preserving privacy at the curb.

  • 21245_market-road · CRIMINAL · Choice ANo, because a drug dog sniff is not a search under the Fourth Amendment

    Why it's attractive

    Sniff may not be a search, but the issue is seizure duration, not search definition.

    Why it's wrong

    Sniff may not be a search, but the issue is seizure duration, not search definition.

  • 21245_market-road · CRIMINAL · Choice CYes, because police may never deploy drug dogs during a traffic stop

    Why it's attractive

    Police CAN use dogs during traffic stops if the stop isn't prolonged or RS exists. 'Never' is fabricated.

    Why it's wrong

    Police CAN use dogs during traffic stops if the stop isn't prolonged or RS exists. 'Never' is fabricated.

  • 21245_market-road · CRIMINAL · Choice DNo, because any lawful traffic stop permits a dog sniff for as long as police want

    Why it's attractive

    Lawful stop doesn't mean unlimited time. Rodriguez: stop must end when mission is complete.

    Why it's wrong

    Lawful stop doesn't mean unlimited time. Rodriguez: stop must end when mission is complete.

Practice the questions that use this trap as a distractor and get full Wrong Answer Forensics on submit.

Practice questions using this trap →
Wrong Doctrine Frame — Trap Taxonomy | BarMatrix