Wrong Frame Contract Theory On A Tort Claim
This trap appears as a wrong-answer choice in 1 active question. Spotting how it is built is the repair: read each example's “why it's attractive” before the “why it's wrong.”
Subject distribution
- Torts1
Example wrong choices
18900_wedding_garden_spill · TORTS · Choice DBar it unless Esther also proves a separate contract with the venue for the lost income.
Why it's attractive
Esther's suit against the venue is in tort (premises-injury negligence). The relevant contracts are the photography contracts she had with the bride-and-groom clients; those contracts measure the loss but are not the cause of action against the venue.
Why it's wrong
Esther's suit against the venue is in tort (premises-injury negligence). The relevant contracts are the photography contracts she had with the bride-and-groom clients; those contracts measure the loss but are not the cause of action against the venue.
Practice the questions that use this trap as a distractor and get full Wrong Answer Forensics on submit.
Practice questions using this trap →