ArchitectureObserved in bank
Wrong Jurisdiction Misstated Rule Sounds Lawyerly
This trap appears as a wrong-answer choice in 1 active question. Spotting how it is built is the repair: read each example's “why it's attractive” before the “why it's wrong.”
Subject distribution
- CRIMINAL1
Example wrong choices
16021_motorboat-sinker-stephen · CRIMINAL · Choice DStephen's violation of the statute requiring an operator's certificate made him guilty of culpable negligence per se, since the statute was designed to protect other waterway users against unqualified operators.
Why it's attractive
Negligence per se is a civil-tort doctrine; it has no criminal-law counterpart. The criminal standard is gross/criminal negligence, not per-se liability from statutory violation alone. Cut as NOT_TRUE.
Why it's wrong
Negligence per se is a civil-tort doctrine; it has no criminal-law counterpart. The criminal standard is gross/criminal negligence, not per-se liability from statutory violation alone. Cut as NOT_TRUE.
Practice the questions that use this trap as a distractor and get full Wrong Answer Forensics on submit.
Practice questions using this trap →